Judge Judy lately made headlines to be the greatest-compensated television personality on the planet, getting $47 million each year for handing lower her very own make of justice. Even though her show creates great entertainment, it does not especially alllow for an excellent education about how exactly the courts work.
Listed here are our top six comparisons between Judge Judy and the real thing, also known to all of us as small claims court.
#1 Both Judge Judy and real small claims courts gather details and evaluate testimony.
Both in scenarios, plaintiffs file complaints, outlining the occasions that happened and reasons they see they’re titled with a restitution. Likewise, defendants react to individuals complaints, explaining why they dispute the claims against them. The judge, whether it is Judy or even the circuit court judge or court commissioner you receive in tangible existence, then weighs the legal merit of every side before ruling.
#2 Idol judges depend on testimony while Judge Judy depends on items in a short complaint.
Inside a real small claims court, idol judges will hear each side, counting on each to provide the salient points of the dispute. But Judge Judy largely beeps the items in a short complaint and uses the courtroom time for you to fire questions, reducing and manipulating the testimony-all towards the amusement of viewers. In tangible existence, idol judges or commissioners are much more sincere, less dominating and, frankly, much less entertaining.
#3 Judge Judy functions being an arbitrator, not really a judge.
Judge Judy is really a upon the market judge becoming an arbitrator, rendering decisions instead of legal judgments. Arbitration is an alternative choice to litigation that is a dispute that’s heard inside a court. In litigation you might appeal. In arbitration, an appeal is rare, although it has happened on a minimum of two occasions with decisions made by Judge Judy.
#4 You will see much more business actions in tangible small claims court.
Judge Judy has a tendency to live in the land of interpersonal squabbles, with folks fighting over pets, perceived loans and other petty disputes-revealing a desire for humanity’s cheapest common denominator. Inside a real small claims court, you are more prone to see a greater diversity of litigants, representing a greater diversity of socioeconomic conditions and more companies and landlords going after collection actions. Cases when hospitals, charge cards and landlords are trying to find money judgments or evictions are a lot of the suits you will see inside a typical small claims court.
#5 On Judge Judy, the losing party does not pay.
Whenever you win a suit inside a real small claims court, the next phase is going to be collecting the judgment. In some instances another party pays immediately to be able to place the matter in it. So when the losing party does not pay, the current party must begin another tactic to collect, whether garnishing wages, collecting collateral or appropriating delinquent goods or property (known as a replevin).